The engineering problem
A proposed station can require comparison with many existing assignments. Frequency proximity alone is not enough: location, antenna characteristics and radio-service criteria may all be relevant. Repeating these searches manually is slow and difficult to audit.
Our engineering approach
We structure the workflow around a proposed station, a versioned station dataset and explicit screening criteria. The software narrows the candidate set, applies the agreed engineering logic and explains why each station is flagged. Detailed coordination decisions remain with the responsible engineering team.
What a project can deliver
- Proposed-station input and validation
- Frequency and geographic candidate filtering
- Service-specific screening with traceable reasons
- Map, table and export views for engineering review
Start with one radio service and a representative station dataset. Validate the screening before adding more services.
What to bring to a first discussion
A proposed-station example, a representative set of existing radio assignments, the relevant service criteria and a known coordination-screening result. Typical fields include coordinates, frequencies, bandwidths and antenna characteristics, depending on the agreed methodology.
Questions about this service
How are coordination candidates identified?
The workflow first selects potentially relevant records using the agreed frequency, geographic and service criteria. It then applies the scoped engineering checks and records why each candidate is included. Missing or uncertain parameters should remain visible for review rather than silently removing a station.
Is this an automatic frequency authorization service?
Our service focuses on building custom engineering software and screening workflows. A software result does not authorize operation or replace review by the responsible engineer, coordinator or administration. Project outputs should make that boundary clear.